HEBERLING LAB

  • Welcome
  • People
  • Publications
  • Photos
  • Collected on this day!
  • Welcome
  • People
  • Publications
  • Photos
  • Collected on this day!

Collected on this day...

a weekly blog featuring specimens in the Carnegie Museum herbarium.
Each specimen has an important scientific and cultural story to tell.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation grant no. DBI 1612079 (2017-2019) and DBI 1801022 (2019-2022). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

October 28, 1920: 102 years ago

10/28/2022

Comments

 
Picture

The Vine that Ate Pittsburgh?
Not yet.

This specimen of Kudzu (Pueraria montana var. lobata) was collected on October 28, 1920 by Neil MCCallum at West End Park, Pittsburgh.  The plant was collected in cultivation, meaning it was intentionally planted and grown in a garden or similar. This specimen is one of the earliest records of the species in Pittsburgh (It was also collected two years before).

Kudzu is a vine in the bean family, Fabaceae, with beautiful purple flowers. Native to East Asia, it was introduced as an ornamental  the United States from from Japan in 1876 at the Philadelphia Centennial Exposition.  It was promoted in the 1930-40s in the southern US to prevent soil erosion.  However, it is now an invasive species, with big ecological impacts.  It is widely known as "the vine that ate the South."  A quick google search will show you striking pictures of the vine covering large areas of land, covering trees, shrubs, logs, and everything.  It shades out existing vegetation and can drastically alter the ecosystem.

It is not common in Pennsylvania, but perhaps might become so.  It is listed by the state as a "Class A Noxious Weed" - meaning it is assessed as a high invasive risk and ecological/economical concern, but is uncommon and possible to be eradicated.  It can not be sold or planted commercially in PA.

It is currently most invasive in the South, but a study published in 2009 by Dr. Bethany Bradley and others suggests that the species may become more invasive in the north (including Pennsylvania) as climate change continues.

You can find this specimen online here, and search our collection at midatlanticherbaria.org.
Picture
Picture
Kudzu (Pueria montana) growing along the Kiskiminetas River in Apollo, Pennsylvania in 2018.  It was likely planted, but seems to be doing quite well.
Comments

January 11, 1951: 71 years ago

1/11/2022

Comments

 
Picture
Leaves gone, but fruits hang on.
 
This specimen of bittersweet (Solanum dulcamara) was collected by Bayard Long on January 11, 1951 in a “rubbish dump” on West Chester Pike, near Broomall, Pennsylvania (outside of Philadelphia).  Bayard Long (1885-1969) was a Philadelphia-area botanist and an active member of the Philadelphia Botanical Club (founded in 1891 and still exists today).  He was a prolific collector and served as Curator of the Club’s Local Herbarium for 56 years (housed at the Academy of Natural Sciences).
 
Bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara) is in an herbaceous vine in the potato or nightshade family (Solanaceae), not to be confused with the similarly named Asian bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculatus), which is an introduced woody vine in the staff vine or bittersweet family (Celastraceae).
 
Bittersweet is an invasive species, introduced from its native range in Europe and Asia as early as the 1800s. It is common to see climbing along fences in urban areas and elsewhere across North America.
 
In the winter, its fleshy red berries are commonly still attached to the vines, long after the leaves are gone.
 
Find this specimen: https://midatlanticherbaria.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=12324234
 
Picture
Picture
Solanum dulcamara in summer with purple flowers and unique leaves (left).

​And in fall, with bright red fruits (right).
Comments

November 2, 1930: 91 years ago

11/2/2021

Comments

 

Native...or not?!

Picture
Though the supercontinent Pangea broke apart many millions of years ago, the Anthropocene is marked by a new kind of Pangea. Though the seven continents as they are today may not be physically connected into a single landmass, they are perhaps more connected than they have ever been. The globalization of human activities has brought species from around the world into contact which otherwise would never interact. Some species are intentionally moved from one continent to another, such as the plants in gardens, while other introductions are accidental, mere unintentional passengers of human increasingly global activities. Introduced species can fundamentally alter the landscape and are regarded as one of the top threats to native biodiversity.
 
Invasive species are those introduced species which are non-native and spread without human intervention.  Many invasive species alter ecosystem functioning and change regional biodiversity. Invasive plant species have become a common part of our landscape. Some were brought over hundreds of years ago by European colonists. Others have arrived much more recently.
 
In Pennsylvania, the invasion of some plant species are obvious – that is, a unique species arrives, thrives, and become abundant. These invasive species have no record of being in the area and can spread rapidly, sometimes over the course of a human lifetime or shorter. Many invasive species are still actively spreading across the landscape. For instance, garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) is a well-known forest herb from Europe introduced to North America in the mid-1800s and after more than a century are now common across Pennsylvania forest. Another obvious example is giant knotweed (Reynoutria sachalinensis), a native to parts of East Asia, first recorded in western Pennsylvania in the 1920s and has since spread to line many of Pennsylvania’s rivers and streams today. You can’t go far in the Pittsburgh region without seeing invasive knotweed.
 
Other species invasions are less obvious. These so called “cryptic invasions” are the introductions of very closely related species or subspecies which originated elsewhere.
 
This specimen of common reed (Phragmites australis) tells the tale of a widespread cryptic invasion. The specimen was collected by Carnegie Museum botany curator Otto Jennings on November 2, 1930 along the shores of Lake Erie at Presque Isle, Pennsylvania. Common reed is a major problematic invasive species, crowding out native species in this unique habitat at Presque Isle. When this specimen was collected over 90 years ago, it was not nearly as abundant as it is now.
 
But is it non-native? Common reed, or often simply called Phragmites, has a very widespread distribution, found in wetlands and shores across all continents except Antarctica. It is even not an uncommon site along wet areas near highways. It is among the most widely distributed plants in the world.
 
Reed is non-native to the United States...well, mostly. In the 1800s, botanists considers Phragmites to be a relatively uncommon plant. Evidence from fossils and paleocological research show that the species has indeed been in North America for many thousands of years. However, it didn’t start to become abundant until the early 1900s and after. Some botanists suggested the sudden success of the species could be due to human disturbance.  A pioneering herbarium-based study 2002 published in the PNAS by Dr. Kristin Saltonstall sequenced DNA from herbarium specimens collected before 1910 and recent collections to show that the spread of Phragmites in the United States was due to the introduction of a non-native strain of the species that originated from Europe.
 
Pretty cool, huh? And this finding was made possible with herbarium specimens.
 
So, is this particular specimen native or not?  I don’t actually know, but with expert examination and genetic analysis, we could find out!
 
Find this specimen and 149 more in the Carnegie Museum herbarium here: https://midatlanticherbaria.org/portal/collections/list.php?db=328&taxa=Phragmites+australis&usethes=1&taxontype=2
Picture
A large stand of Phragmites at Presque Isle State Park, Pennsylvania (August 2019).
Comments

January 1911: 110 years ago

1/31/2021

Comments

 
Picture
Not yet blooming here, but it likely is in the Mediterranean.
 
This specimen of lesser celandine (Ficaria verna formerly known as Ranunculus ficaria, in the buttercup family, Ranunculaceae) was collected in January 1911 by Mary F. Spencer in Corsica.  A part of France, Corsica is an island in the Mediterranean.  This specimen was collected in its native range, which extends from Europe to west Asia.
 
Lesser celandine is quite remarkable, one of the earliest blooming spring wildflowers. It isn’t blooming in the Pittsburgh region yet, but can be as early as March.  It was introduced to North America and is actively spreading throughout forest understories in Western PA and beyond, especially along streams and floodplains.
 
Lesser celandine is a problematic invasive species. And only likely to become more of a problem as it actively spreads across the landscape.  It is unique among invasive species, perhaps the only with a “spring ephemeral” ecological strategy.  Spring ephemerals produce leaves and flowers very early in the spring and dies back before the overstory trees produce leaves.  It forms dense mats along the forest floor, crowding out our native spring wildflowers.
 
It was introduced intentionally as a garden plant, producing glossy, yellow flowers which can be quite beautiful.  But it should not be planted, as it negatively impacts our forests and can easily spread outside gardens into natural areas.
 
Keep an eye out for this species in Pennsylvania!  I have been noticing it more each year. 
 
Find this lesser celandine species here:  https://midatlanticherbaria.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=12087827
 
Picture
Lesser celandine (Ficaria verna​) invasion in Fox Chapel, Pennsylvania.  The species can form dense mats on the forest floor, emerging in early spring in a spectacular display of flowers.  But it is very invasive, crowding out native species.  As a spring ephemeral, the species takes advantage of the high light levels in the spring and completes its aboveground life cycle before being shaded out by the trees overhead.
Picture
Comments

October 11, 1979: 40 years ago

10/11/2019

Comments

 
Picture

From wild to cultivated to invasive

This specimen of Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) was collected on October 11, 1979 by W.Z. Fang in Jiangsu, China. Callery pear is native to East Asia (China, Vietnam).
 
But...Callery pear can be found in the United States. It was (and is) widely planted as an ornamental landscape tree.  Along streets, in residential yards, in parking lots  - it was a prized plant for well-groomed anthropogenic landscapes. It uniformly grows in low resource conditions, explodes with many beautiful blossoms each spring, provides shade, and has a decent foliage display in the autumn. As many introduced plants go, it went from prized ornamental to an unwanted “invasive species,” spreading across the landscape and affecting the environment. It is now widely recognized invasive species in many states or closely watched as a species likely to become invasive. That said, beyond the legacy of over half a century of mass plantings across the country, it is still common planted and old and new cultivars are commercially available.  USDA estimated over $23 million in sales in the US in 2009 alone.
 
How’d Callery pear get to the US? The story behind the introduction of Callery pear is a fascinating one.  Like many of our cultivated plants, seeds were collected on special expeditions in search of plants useful to horticulture, agriculture, or just because. Pyrus calleryana was first introduced to the US in the early 1900s, though not for its attractive blossoms as you might expect. Instead, it was first introduced for its disease resistance. It was successfully used in horticulture as a root stock for European pear fruit production. At the time, European pears in the Pacific northwestern US were being hit hard, grafting to a Callery pear rootstock dramatically decreased crop losses to disease. Callery pear does not produce edible fruit.

​The tree was widely planted starting in the 1960s, when it became commercially available and promoted by the nursery industry as a hardy ornamental tree.  Before that, it was planted by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) for testing at Plant Introduction Stations in Corvallis, Oregon, and Glenn Dale, Maryland. One of these Maryland planted trees was targeted for its special traits and became the source of the hugely popular ‘Bradford’ cultivar (“Bradford pear”). In 1952, one tree was used to graft to rootstock, a plant propagation method making all plants genetically identical.  Other cultivars have since been commercialized, but ‘Bradford’ were/are exceptionally popular. Though intended to be sterile (non-reproducing), it turned out the trees were capable of setting viable seed.   The cultivars themselves are not invasive, but because multiple cultivars exist, together they can cross-pollinate to become invasive.

Picture
This flowering specimen (above) from University of Maryland Norton-Brown Herbarium (MARY) was collected  in 1963 from the US  Plant Introduction Garden in Glenn Dale, MD  -- THE site behind the widespread introduction of this species!
Herbarium specimens have been critical to understanding the spread of this species.  In a 2005 study, Dr. Michael Vincent (Miami University in Ohio) found that 50% all specimens examined over the range of 39 years were collected between 2000-2003.  Though some specimens  were collected in the 1960s in natural areas, it became widely “escaped” from cultivation in many natural  areas in the 1990s.
 
You may have noticed that most of our specimen images to date are those collected in Pennsylvania and surrounding states.  That’s because these specimens are being digitized as part of a multi-institutional project, the Mid-Atlantic Megalopolis Project, with the overarching goal to mobilize herbarium specimens across the region  to understand the effects of urbanization on plant life.  However, this project is a step towards digitizing the entire Carnegie Museum Herbarium.  The herbarium is worldwide in scope, and specimens in the Mid-Atlantic region accounting for only 35% of the 540,000 specimens.
 
As more specimens become digitized as part of the Mid-Atlantic Megalopolis Project, we’ll have a more complete understanding of the introduction and spread of Callery pear in the region.
 
Herbarium specimens are collected in the native range too! We’ll be able to compare specimens collected in the invaded range to those in its native China. The use of cultivated specimens and those collected in the native range are underutilized  but can provide critical information.

Picture
This historically fascinating specimen (above) from Howard University Herbarium (HUDC) below, digitized through the Mid-Atlantic Megalopolis Project, is among the oldest specimens collected in the region. Collected in spring of 1965 in Maryland   by Frederick Meyer from a cultivated plant at the US National Arboretum, with the note on the label: “China: Seeds collected by Peter Liu, Hupeh Province. Rec’d.  March 10, 1932.” The US National Arboretum was instrumental in the development and popularity of the ‘Bradford’ and other cultivars.
Picture
Escaped from cultivation. This specimen  (above) from Muhlenberg College Herbarium (MCA) was collected along the roadway in Montgomery county, Pennsylvania by Bayard Long in 1962. This specimen is probably the earliest specimen collected in the wild in Pennsylvania.
Many more specimens like this will be brought to light through the Mid-Atlantic Megalopolis Project.
 
Read more about this species introduction history in the popular press, published in the Washington Post  last year, and in an excellent overview by Dr. Theresa Culley (University of Cinncinati) in Arnoldia and another in BioScience.
 
See all the Pyrus calleryana specimens being made available online from the Mid-Atlantic Megalopolis project here: http://midatlanticherbaria.org/portal/collections/list.php?db=277%2C328%2C334%2C329%2C333%2C320%2C330%2C40%2C410%2C316%2C335%2C331%2C332%3B11&includecult=1&taxa=Pyrus+calleryana&usethes=1&taxontype=2
​
Comments

September 28, 1983: 35 years ago

9/28/2018

Comments

 
Picture
​Many invasive species in our region were ironically first introduced intentionally.  The tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima) is one such example, originally praised with enthusiasm as a lovely garden tree, fast growing, well behaved, resistant to pests and pollution – therefore an excellent urban street tree.  Tree-of-heaven was introduced first to Europe from northern China, then to North America in the 1780s to a garden in Philadelphia.  Decades later (and several additional introductions), it grew in popularity to become widely available and adopted for use in town and city plantings through the mid-1800s, including New York City.  By the 1900s, it was widely naturalized in both urban and rural areas across much of the United States.  It is now recognized by most states as an invasive species.  Tree-of-heaven was the namesake tree in Betty Smith’s 1943 classic novel, A Tree Grows in Brooklyn.
 
This specimen was collected by Sue Thompson and Lawrence LaSpoda on September 28, 1983 in Panther Hollow, not far from the Carnegie Museum in Pittsburgh.
 
Keep an eye out for this weedy tree, which is common throughout the city and along highways.  Its seeds are especially noticeably this time of year and persist on the tree into the winter.
Picture
Comments

September 7, 2016: 2 years ago

9/7/2018

Comments

 
Picture
​It is now a common plant in forests across Pennsylvania, but it wasn’t always.  This specimen of Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) was collected on September 7, 2017 by Mason Heberling (me!) at Trillium Trail, Fox Chapel, PA.  Native to East Asia, Japanese stiltgrass is an annual grass that is said to have first been introduced accidentally to Knoxville, Tennessee around 1919, used as packing material for porcelain dishes from China.  It has since become a major invasive species, spreading across forests of Eastern North America.  It is commonly found along trails, forest roads, and floodplains.  It has been shown to be facilitated by deer overabundance.  A recent study of unconventional gas well pads (such as “fracking”) in Pennsylvania by Penn State researchers found that recent hydraulic fracturing activities facilitates stiltgrass invasion (Barlow et al., 2017 Journal of Environmental Management).  Japanese stiltgrass is especially common in common disturbed moist forests, where available light in the understory is higher.  Therefore, it often carpets the forest floor in disturbed forests.  High densities of deer have also been shown to facilitate stiltgrass invasions.  In fact, much of this research was done at Trillium Trail by Susan Kalisz (then at University of Pittsburgh, now at University of Tennessee Knoxville).  Read more here: https://kaliszlab.weebly.com/uploads/2/5/1/2/25120034/knightsmithdaviskalisz-na_j2009.pdf   They used fences to exclude deer and found that stiltgrass was not present in fenced plots, but abundant when deer were allowed access. The Kalisz lab actively remains at Trillium Trail.
 
Although collected only two years ago, I was surprised to find that this specimen was the oldest Japanese stiltgrass specimen collected in Allegheny county!  There is a chance it had been collected earlier and exists in another herbarium. It was said to be uncommon (possibly absent) at Trillium Trail until 2002. 
 
What will our forests look like in another 10 years?  Herbarium specimens are important, verifiable sources to document our changing flora.  And ultimately, help conserve our flora.

Picture
Once you learn to recognize this grass, you are likely to see it everywhere in forests and forest edges in Western Pennsylvania. It is especially obvious in the Fall, when it flowers and has reached its peak growth. Note the faint white line along the center of the leaf blades.
Picture
​Microstegium vimineum carpeting the forest floor outside deer fences at Trillium Trail.  
Picture
Comments

August 11, 2018: 11 days ago

8/22/2018

Comments

 
Celebrating the weed that engulfed western Pennsylvania? ​
Picture
Picture
Knotweeds collected at the 7th Annual Knotweed Festival in Blairsville, Pennsylvania.
Banks along Conemaugh River, August 11, 2018.  
Left: Giant knotweed (Fallopia sachalinensis); Right: Bohemian knotweed (Fallopia x bohemica).
Picture
Picture

​A few weekends ago, I went to the 7th annual Knotweed Festival in Blairsville, about 40 miles east of Pittsburgh in Indiana County.  Aside from reading a brief advertisement, I knew little about the festival before going. But, given I study non-native plant invasions, I had to go to a celebration named after a local weed that is a focus of my research! And this invader is one of the most aggressive and widespread ones in western Pennsylvania – Japanese knotweed.
 
Native to East Asia, Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica) is a large herbaceous perennial that was first introduced as to the U.S. in the late 1800s as an ornamental.  As its name suggests, it eventual spread well outside of gardens to become a major nuisance. More troubling, the spread of the species displaces native vegetation and disrupts the natural function of the ecosystem.  The plant has thick hollow stems that somewhat resemble bamboo, although they are not related (knotweed is in the buckwheat family, Polygonaceae; bamboo in the grass family, Poaceae).  Knotweed spreads through persistent belowground structures called rhizomes (belowground stems), as well as by seed.  Small fragments of rhizomes can be washed downstream and easily establish, often forming dense stands along Pittsburgh’s many streams and rivers. Knotweed is among the most economically and ecologically problematic invasive plants in Pennsylvania.
 
So, why name a community festival after this invasive plant?!  Despite the dislike for the plant, the community of Blairsville named the festival partly as a tongue-in-cheek sentiment for the plant that has taken over the landscape and partly to recognize the weed as embedded into the local culture. The nearby Conemaugh River that runs throughs Blairsville has been transformed by this non-native species, completely covering the banks with stands so dense they completely block the view of the river along the community recreational trail.
Picture
My family and I had a great time at the festival, visiting local craft and food vendors, musicians and other entertainment, a monarch butterfly display, and complete with a parade.  I even bought soap made from the rhizomes and stems of knotweed collected by the river. 
Picture
​ At first, I had mixed feelings about naming a festival after an aggressive invasive plant known to cause ecological harm. On one hand, it embraces the nature around us – whether we like it or not, non-native plants are part of the landscape around us. The global movement of plants around the globe is one of the defining features of the Anthropocene, the current era of pervasive human influence on the environment and Earth’s systems. But, on the other hand, naming a festival after an invasive species normalizes plant invasions and perhaps even embraces the change to the landscape as a good thing.  Despite my initial mixed feelings, I think the festival is a great community gathering that has the potential to raise awareness about the presence of the invasive plant in our community, its ecological effects, and in turn, nature around us (native and non-native).
 
It turns out there are more than one species of invasive knotweed in western PA: Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica), Giant knotweed (Fallopia sachalinensis), and a hybrid between the two species, Bohemian knotweed (Fallopia x bohemica).  The hybrid was only recognized in the past several decades and likely originated when these two species “met” after they were introduced in Europe.  The three species are visually similar.  Giant knotweed can be distinguished by its large (usually much larger than your hand), heart-shaped leaves. Japanese knotweed and the hybrid Bohemian knotweed are much more difficult to distinguish, with much variation in leaf shape.  Japanese knotweed tends to be rounder in shape, while the Bohemian knotweed is intermediate between the other two species in leaf shape and size.  The leaf hairs are sometimes the only definitive identifying feature.
Image below: Last year, I found all three knotweed species growing together at the same site near the Allegheny River and Barking Slopes Conservation Area, near New Kensington/Plum, PA.  Left to right: Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica), Bohemian knotweed (Fallopia xbohemica), Giant knotweed (Fallopia sachalinensis).
Picture
​While I was at the Knotweed Festival, I collected some knotweed specimens for the Carnegie Museum’s herbarium. Along the Conemaugh River in Blairsville, I collected both the Giant knotweed and Bohemian knotweed (the hybrid).  But, I did not find any Japanese knotweed. (I suspect my knotweed soap is actually made from Giant knotweed, after all.)
 
The earliest herbarium specimens from Indiana County were collected in 1952 along the Conemaugh River in Saltsburg (not far from Blairsville).  Interestingly, these specimens were of Giant knotweed and Bohemian knotweed – the same species I collected.
Picture
Picture
Keep an eye out for knotweed. 
If you live in western PA, chances are that you see it every day! 

Comments

July 28, 1944: 74 years ago

7/26/2018

Comments

 
Picture
Did you know Queen Anne’s lace is closely related to the carrot in your garden?  In fact, it is also called wild carrot. This specimen of Queen Anne’s lace aka wild carrot (Daucus carota) was collected in Coudersport, Pennsylvania (Potter county) on July 28, 1944 by Thomas K. Barrie.
 
Queen Anne’s lace is a common weed throughout the temperate world.  Its blooms are a sign of summer in Pittsburgh.  Not only is it in the carrot family (Apiaceae), but in fact, domesticated carrots are a cultivar of a subspecies of Queen Anne’s lace – Daucus carota subsp. sativus. 
 
Carefully pull this species out of the ground and you’ll find a hefty, fleshy tap root that looks and smells like the carrots we all know. 

Its white umbrella like clusters of flowers (called "umbels") are characteristic of the carrot family (Apiaceae), which also includes other well know species in our area such as poison hemlock.
 
Queen Anne’s lace is native to temperate Europe/Asia and was introduced to North America.  It is now widely naturalized in fields and roadsides.
Picture
Picture
Comments

July 17, 1968: 50 years ago

7/17/2018

Comments

 
Picture
Herbarium specimens can provide insight into plant-insect interactions.  For instance, many specimens show obvious signs of insect damage to the leaves or flowers.  Many other specimens, upon closer inspection under magnification, show damage that is much subtler.  Sometimes, even the larvae or insects were also pressed with the plant!  Some of this damage may have happened from pests in the herbarium that occurred over decades of storage.  Damage from herbarium pests is a serious concern and collection managers are also conservators of these archives, keeping a vigilant eye out for damage from the elements (such as light, temperature, humidity, water, and other chemicals) and introduced pests (such as mold and insects).  However, damage that occurs in the herbarium is minimized for long term preservation and luckily, insect damage that occurs in the herbarium is often easily distinguished from herbivory that happened in the wild, before the plant was collected, dried, pressed, and added to the collection.
 
Few studies to date have used the herbarium record to understand the ecology and evolution of plant-insect interactions. However, there are several pioneering studies at the frontier of this novel use of these collections.
 
This specimen pictured above of wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa) was collected by Leroy Henry on July 17, 1968 along the Pennsylvania Turnpike not far from Pittsburgh.  Leroy Henry was an influential Curator of Botany at the Carnegie Museum from 1937-1973, having collected thousands of specimens in the herbarium.
 
In addition to the “standard” herbarium label that gives information on what the specimen was first identified as, where it was collected, who collected it, etc., check out another typed label affixed to this sheet.  This annotation label indicates two seeds were removed from for chemical analysis in 2005.  Annotation labels are commonly added to specimens years to centuries later to note its use in a study, a new identification, and/or part of the specimen was removed.
 
Picture
​
This specimen was one of many specimens included in a study on wild parsnip by Zangerl and Berenbaum published in 2005 in the high-profile journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).  
 
Wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa) was introduced to the United States from Europe centuries ago and has since spread to become invasive.  The species is a member of the carrot family (Apiaceae).  Like many other species in this plant family, wild parsnip produce phototoxic chemicals called furanocoumarins, which protect the plant from insect herbivory.  These compounds also cause major skin irritations in humans, reacting with sunlight to cause nasty rashes.  This group of chemicals is of the same fame of giant hogweed, poison hemlock, and other well-known toxic plants in the United States.
 
Zangerl and Berenbaum (2005) analyzed herbarium specimens collected over the past 150+ years.  These specimens were collected from before wild parsnip was widespread in the US and compared those to specimens collected more recently, after the species was widely established.  A major herbivore, the parsnip webworm (Depressaria pastinacella) was also accidentally introduced in the mid-late 1800s.  The authors found that as rates of webworm attack increased, so did the toxicity of wild parsnip.  Specimens from 1850-1889 (early stages of introduction) had lower levels of the toxic furanocoumarins than plants collected more recently, as well as than specimens collected in their native range (Europe), where the parsnip webworm is also native.
 
There is so much known and unrealized potential in herbarium specimens.  This particular specimen was not collected with the intention of studying the ecology and evolution of plant-insect interactions.   This study helped inform our current and future use of biological control agents to manage introduced species.
 
These unanticipated uses (often decades to over a century after a specimen was collected!) illustrate the incredible power of natural history collections.
 
See an excellent paper by Meineke et al. just published on this topic (including quantifying the effects of climate change on plant herbivory through herbarium specimens): https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ecm.1307.
 
Check out the cool parsnip webworm study here: http://www.pnas.org/content/102/43/15529
Picture
Picture
Wild parsnip (Pastinaca sativa) in an unmowed roadside median next to Bloomfield Bridge, Pittsburgh PA on June 29, 2018.
Comments
<<Previous

    RSS Feed

      Suggest a specimen!

      Your birthday, favorite species, collected by your house, a particular collector, etc...?
      [object Object]
    Submit

    Archives

    October 2022
    April 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017

    Categories

    All
    Amaryllidaceae
    Anacardiaceae
    Apiaceae
    Apocynaceae
    Aquifoliaceae
    Araceae
    Araliaceae
    Asparagaceae
    Asteraceae
    Balsaminaceae
    Betulaceae
    Boraginaceae
    Brassicaceae
    Cactaceae
    Caprifoliaceae
    Caricaceae
    Caryophyllaceae
    Celastraceae
    Climate Change
    Convolvulaceae
    Cornaceae
    Cucurbitaceae
    Cultivated
    Cupressaceae
    Dioscoreaceae
    Dryopteridaceae
    Ericaceae
    Euphorbiaceae
    Fabaceae
    Fagaceae
    Geraniaceae
    Hamamelidaceae
    Holiday Posts
    Introduced Species
    Lamiaceae
    Lauraceae
    Life History Series
    Liliaceae
    Limnanthaceae
    Lycopodiaceae
    Magnoliaceae
    Malvaceae
    Melanthiaceae
    Melastomataceae
    Montiaceae
    Myristicaceae
    Oleaceae
    Onagraceae
    Orobanchaceae
    Oxalidaceae
    Papaveraceae
    Paulowniaceae
    Pinaceae
    Plantaginaceae
    Plants Of The Anthropocene
    Poaceae
    Poisonous
    Polemoniaceae
    Polygonaceae
    Primulaceae
    Pteridaceae
    Ranunculaceae
    Recollected
    Recollection
    Rhamnaceae
    Rosaceae
    Rubiaceae
    Salicaceae
    Santalaceae
    Sapindaceae
    Scrophulariaceae
    Simaroubaceae
    Solanaceae
    Staphyleaceae
    Type Specimens
    Ulmaceae
    Undetermined
    Urban Plants
    Violaceae
    Vitaceae